Voisinet v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• driver’s license is not suspended for the purpose of visiting additional punishment upon an offender but in order to protect the public against incompetent and careless drivers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Luk v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-11-27· cited 89×
• Arnold v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-02-29· cited 22×
• Voisinet v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-27· cited 14×
• Ex Parte Mata
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1996-06-06· cited 9×
• Voisinet v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-06-12· cited 2×
• Champagne v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1996-03-06· cited 1×
• Ex Parte: Lee Elvin Arnold, Jr.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-02-07

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Halper
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 1,945×
• Witte v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 870×
• Texas Department of Public Safety v. Richardson
  Texas Supreme Court· 1964-11-11· cited 64×
• Watson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 59×
• State v. Brabson
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-04-28· cited 44×
• Raitano v. Texas Department of Public Safety
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1993-07-01· cited 40×
• Burrows v. Texas Department of Public Safety
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-10-05· cited 18×
• Walton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-05-21· cited 17×
• State v. Aguilar
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1995-09-20· cited 11×