Waters v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is evident from the views of these eminent jurists, that the opinion which should exclude a juror must be a fixed and deliberate one, partaking in fact of the nature of a pre-judgment.” (emphasis added
• “It is evident from the views of these eminent jurists, that the opinion which should exclude a juror must be a fixed and deliberate one, partaking in fact of the nature of a pre-judgment.” (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-09· cited 107×
• Dingle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-15· cited 95×
• White v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-09-13· cited 74×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-10· cited 73×
• Morris v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-04· cited 69×
• Garlitz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1889-06-26· cited 63×
• Langley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-11-02· cited 58×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-07-21· cited 47×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-02-26· cited 39×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-24· cited 39×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-07-02· cited 29×
• Ford Motor Co. v. Wood
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-08· cited 28×
• Hurley v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-16· cited 25×
• State v. Hardy
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-08-27· cited 18×
• Bernadyn v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-09-05· cited 5×
• State v. Ablonczy
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2021-06-23· cited 4×
• Mitchell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2024-08-14· cited 2×