Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/9/1992
Warrick v. State
Citations
- 607 A.2d 24
- 326 Md. 696
- 1992 Md. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving for the first time the use of an in camera hearing to determine whether the defendant had been prejudiced by non-disclosure of the confidential informant and remanded so the trial court could conduct such a hearing
- approving for the first time the use of an in camera hearing to determine whether the defendant had been prejudiced by non-disclosure of the confidential informant and remanded so the trial court could conduct such a hearing
- ordering a limited remand to hold an in camera hearing to determine whether the defendant was entitled to the name of a confidential State informant, and if so, whether he suffered prejudice due to the State’s failure to provide the name of that informant
- remand for in camera examination to determine whether defendant entitled to disclosure of informant’s identity, and whether defendant prejudiced by non-disclosure
- remand for in camera examination to determine whether defendant entitled to disclosure of informant's identity, and whether defendant prejudiced by non-disclosure
- limited remand instructing the trial court to make certain findings related to the informer's privilege; if trial court concluded that defendant was prejudiced, then it should order new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-18· cited 99×
- Southern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-17· cited 36×
- Montgomery Mutual Insurance v. ChessonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-05-23· cited 34×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-21· cited 28×
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-05-01· cited 18×
- Patrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-30· cited 17×
- Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-13· cited 7×
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1998-07-17· cited 6×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-11-15· cited 5×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-06· cited 5×
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-06-14· cited 4×
- Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-06-12· cited 1×
- Blann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-19
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 885×
- People v. DardenNew York Court of Appeals· 1974-05-15· cited 289×
- People v. DaileySupreme Court of Colorado· 1982-01-25· cited 92×
- Photo Electronics Corporation v. John M. England, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Ferrex Corporation, Photo Electronics Corporation v. Ferrex CorporationNinth Circuit· 1978-09-08· cited 82×
- Zaal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-03-16· cited 79×
- Fort Howard Paper Co. v. William D. Witter, Inc.Second Circuit· 1986-03-27· cited 78×
- United States v. David Wayne FreundFifth Circuit· 1976-01-07· cited 66×
- Commonwealth v. DouzanisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1981-08-21· cited 65×
- United States v. Cesar Tenorio-AngelEleventh Circuit· 1985-04-08· cited 64×
- United States v. Alvin G. SharpSixth Circuit· 1985-12-10· cited 63×
- United States v. Gerald George Weir, United States of America v. Daniel Wesley DavisEighth Circuit· 1978-05-17· cited 57×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-27· cited 57×
- Moore v. SmythSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 42×
- Nutter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-02-10· cited 40×
- William A. Gaines v. Norman B. Hess and the Attorney General of the State of OklahomaTenth Circuit· 1981-11-02· cited 34×
- United States v. CorteseThird Circuit· 1980-02-08· cited 34×
- United States v. Robert Wilhelm Brinkman, A/K/A Robert H. MausgroverFourth Circuit· 1984-07-26· cited 32×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.