Skip to main content
· 8/21/1981

Commonwealth v. Douzanis

Citations

  • 425 N.E.2d 326
  • 384 Mass. 434
  • 1981 Mass. LEXIS 1425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring something more than \naked claim\ that affiant fabricated information before ordering Franks/Amral hearing
  • substantial preliminary showing required; factual errors in affidavit concerning information furnished by informant generally insufficient to require Franks hearing
  • Commonwealth may seek discretionary relief from single justice of this court as to disclosure order
  • dismissal of indictment may be proper remedy for Commonwealth’s failure to comply with discovery order
  • “government’s privilege not to disclose the identity of an informant has long been recognized in this Commonwealth”
  • “except in an in camera proceeding,” judge should not require “disclosure of the identity of an informant. . . without some reason apparent on the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.