· 8/21/1981
Commonwealth v. Douzanis
Citations
- 425 N.E.2d 326
- 384 Mass. 434
- 1981 Mass. LEXIS 1425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring something more than \naked claim\ that affiant fabricated information before ordering Franks/Amral hearing
- substantial preliminary showing required; factual errors in affidavit concerning information furnished by informant generally insufficient to require Franks hearing
- Commonwealth may seek discretionary relief from single justice of this court as to disclosure order
- dismissal of indictment may be proper remedy for Commonwealth’s failure to comply with discovery order
- “government’s privilege not to disclose the identity of an informant has long been recognized in this Commonwealth”
- “except in an in camera proceeding,” judge should not require “disclosure of the identity of an informant. . . without some reason apparent on the record”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hennessey, Wilkins, Abrams, Nolan, Lynch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.