Skip to main content

Patrick v. State

Citations

  • 617 A.2d 215
  • 329 Md. 24
  • 1992 Md. LEXIS 198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reports of State experts who have conducted polygraph tests were discoverable and on remand allocated the burden to the State to show that the defendant was not prejudiced by prior non-disclosure
  • holding that reports of State experts who have conducted polygraph tests were discoverable and on remand allocated the burden to the State to show that the defendant was not prejudiced by prior non-disclosure
  • ordering a limited remand to determine whether a criminal defendant was prejudiced by the State’s failure to disclose polygraph test results
  • ordering a limited remand to determine whether a criminal defendant was prejudiced by the State’s failure to disclose polygraph test results
  • ordering a limited remand to determine whether a criminal defendant was prejudiced by the State's failure to disclose polygraph test results
  • the State was required, under Rule 4-263(b)(4), to provide the defense the results of all polygraph tests it conducted even if that information was not independently relevant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Rodowsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.