Skip to main content
· 10/2/2003

Warner-Lambert Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA

Citations

  • 289 F. Supp. 2d 515
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24318
  • 2003 WL 22327182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In light of Teva’s experts’ affidavits affirming the lack of obviousness of the saacharide [sic] claim limitation Warner-Lambert is entitled to summary judgment of validity of claims 1, 4-10 and 12 of the ’450 patent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debevoise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.