Skip to main content

Ware v. State

Citations

  • 816 N.E.2d 1167
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2182
  • 2004 WL 2453038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the trial court’s order where “the restitution order violate[d] the restitution statute”
  • victim’s testimony that defendant performed deviate sexual conduct on multiple occasions during time period sufficient to sustain convictions
  • “[w]hen a limiting instruction is given that certain evidence may be considered for only a particular purpose, the law will presume that the jury will follow the trial court’s admonitions”
  • “[T]he testimony that Ware took S.H. on several vacations may have some relevance to the State's theory that Ware was “grooming” S.H. by regaling him with vacations and other luxuries[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Crone, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.