Skip to main content

Hernandez v. State

Citations

  • 785 N.E.2d 294
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 421
  • 2003 WL 1272859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that we will presume that the jury will follow the court’s admonitions to consider evidence for a particular purpose
  • statements from an officer indicating that defendant’s business was engaged in prostitution when defendant was on trial for prostitution were unduly prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Sharpnack, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.