Lohmiller v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no evidentiary basis for a restitution order in favor of County, but remanding with instructions to determine the actual damages, if any, suffered as a result of defendant’s crimes
• concluding that there was no evidentiary basis for a restitution order in favor of County, but remanding with instructions to determine the actual damages, if any, suffered as a result of defendant’s crimes
• concluding the trial court committed fundamental error by awarding restitution to a County where the State failed to argue that the County was a “victim” under Indiana Code section 35-50-5-3
• “[T]he trend in recent caselaw shows our penchant for addressing such challenges on appeal if the trial court exceeded its statutory authority when it entered the order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).