Skip to main content

Mitchell v. State

Citations

  • 730 N.E.2d 197
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 862
  • 2000 WL 730425

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant waived appellate review of a restitution order both because he failed to object to the order and because he had invited the error by agreeing to pay for the victim’s counseling
  • providing that the defendant had waived his appellate challenge to the trial court’s restitution order because he had invited the error alleged
  • providing that the defendant had waived his appellate challenge to the trial court’s restitution order because he had invited the error alleged
  • explaining that Mitchell waived appellate review of the trial court’s restitution order at sentencing when he expressed his willingness to pay restitution
  • providing that Mitchell waived his appellate challenge to the trial court’s restitution order by agreeing to pay restitution
  • upholding restitution order where Mitchell agreed to pay counseling expenses up to a certain dollar amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brook, Darden, Mattingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.