Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 298 Ga. 406
  • 782 S.E.2d 269
  • 2016 Ga. LEXIS 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, although the appellant was present for the factual development of the reason for a juror's removal, he had a right to be present when the court asked for legal argument and then removed the juror
  • holding that, although the appellant was present for the factual development of the reason for a juror’s removal, he had a right to be present when the court asked for legal argument and then removed the juror
  • merger errors may be corrected on appeal even if not raised by the parties
  • merger errors may be corrected on appeal even if not raised by the parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nahmias

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.