Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 611 S.E.2d 3
  • 279 Ga. 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, if the communications at issue “are not afforded privileged status,” it “negates any claim that their disclosure violated defendants’ right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment”
  • noting that “after an in-camera inspection, the trial court determined that no confidential communications were implicated” through attorney-client privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.