Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/21/2010
State v. Pierce
Citations
- 225 P.3d 1146
- 223 Ariz. 570
- 574 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
- 2010 WL 199683
- 2010 Ariz. App. LEXIS 7
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that in Roper, “[t]he [Supreme] Court expressly intimated that a natural life sentence for a juvenile who committed murder is not unconstitutionally cruel and unusual”
- stating that in Roper, \[t]he [Supreme] Court expressly intimated that a natural life sentence for a juvenile who committed murder is not unconstitutionally cruel and unusual\
- the Supreme Court in Roper “expressly intimated that a natural life sentence for a juvenile who committed murder is not unconstitutionally cruel and unusual”
- the Supreme Court in Roper “expressly intimated that a natural life sentence for a juvenile who committed murder is not unconstitutionally cruel and unusual”
- the Supreme Court in Roper “expressly intimated that a natural life sentence for a juvenile who committed murder is not unconstitutionally cruel and unusual”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Portley, Johnsen, Barker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Andrew Conley v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-07-31· cited 392×
- Loggins v. ThomasEleventh Circuit· 2011-09-07· cited 101×
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2011-01-25· cited 39×
- Bun v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2015-02-16· cited 15×
- Kenneth Loggins v. ThomasEleventh Circuit· 2011-09-07
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 4,521×
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
- State v. FontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-26· cited 235×
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-25· cited 61×
- Wallace v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-01· cited 36×
- United States v. Kendrix D. FeemsterEighth Circuit· 2007-04-25· cited 31×
- Crowell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-01-07· cited 30×
- Ledcke v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-04-21· cited 17×
- State v. CraigLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-10-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.