State v. Carrasquillo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant adduced psychiatric testimony regarding development of adolescent brain generally and defendant’s cognitive development in particular, after examining defendant on three occasions
• defendant adduced psychiatric testimony regarding development of adolescent brain generally and defendant's cognitive development in particular, after examining defendant on three occasions
• ‘‘we will not entertain an appeal when the question presented is purely academic’’
• “we will not entertain an appeal when the question presented is purely academic”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rizzo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-11-29· cited 62×
• Garcia v. City of Hartford
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-30· cited 20×
• State v. Fernandez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2016-12-27· cited 9×
• State v. Rivera
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-10-17· cited 8×
• Carrasquillo v. Commissioner of Correction
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-07-27· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Roper v. Simmons
  Supreme Court· 2005-03-01· cited 3,523×
• Tuilaepa v. California
  Supreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 983×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
• State v. Singh
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 212×
• State v. Warholic
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-30· cited 150×
• Arey v. Warden
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-06-08· cited 85×
• State v. Grant
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-04-22· cited 63×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-25· cited 61×
• Wallace v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2008-08-01· cited 36×
• Pasquariello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-03-20· cited 32×