Wallace v. Simpson Pasadena Paper Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Chapter 95 encompasses all common-law negligence claims
• reasoning that burden rests on plaintiff to show both control and knowledge of danger
• concluding, however, that neither scenario was at issue where mill owner specifically told independent contractor employees pipe was not empty
• concluding, however, that neither scenario was at issue where mill owner specifically told independent contractor employees pipe was not empty
• concluding, however, that neither scenario was at issue where mill owner specifically told independent contractor employees pipe was not empty
• holding plaintiff “was required to surmount the defense provided by Chapter 95 as to all of his claims that sounded in negligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).