Koch Refining Co. v. Chapa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the independent contractor’s employee did not present any evidence that the premises owner instructed the employee in lifting a pipe, which led to the employee’s injury
• holding that instructions to perform work in a safe manner and the authority to stop dangerous conduct was no evidence of actual control
• holding that instructions to perform work in a safe manner and the authority to stop dangerous conduct was no evidence of actual control
• holding that presence of premises owner’s safety representative and possibility that safety employee might have intervened to stop dangerous work not sufficient to create duty
• holding that the independent contractor’s employee did not present any evidence that the premises owner instructed the employee in lifting a pipe, which led to the employee’s injury
• holding that the independent contractor’s employee did not present any evidence that the premises owner instructed the employee in lifting a pipe, which led to the employee’s injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).