Skip to main content
· 2/14/2005

Wallace v. County of Comal

Citations

  • 400 F.3d 284
  • 22 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1658
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 2394
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,927
  • 2005 WL 348155

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cautioning that the “exercise of this jurisdiction is only proper in rare and unique circumstances” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • “[T]here is perhaps no subset of matters of public concern more important than bringing official misconduct to light.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)
  • “Even if the government official’s conduct violates a clearly established right, the official is nonetheless entitled to qualified immunity if his conduct was objectively reasonable.”
  • court does not consider arguments first raised in reply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Stewart, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.