Skip to main content
· 3/2/1998

Thornton v. General Motors Corp.

Citations

  • 136 F.3d 450
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 343
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 3264
  • 1998 WL 85800

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • severing portion of district court's order imposing Rule 11 monetary sanctions from portion ordering payment of attorney's fees
  • “[WJhere sanctions are imposed under Rule 11(c)(1)(B) by a district court on its own initiative, ... the award of attorney’s fees ... [does not] constitute a valid sanction.”
  • “Normally, an unquantified award of attorney’s fees does not constitute a final appealable order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.”
  • “Pendant appellate jurisdiction is only proper . . . where a final appealable order is ‘inextricably intertwined’ with an unappealable order or where review of the unappealable order is necessary to ensure meaningful review of the appealable order.”
  • “[W]e are obligated to satisfy ourselves that appellate jurisdiction is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Parker, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.