Charles v. Grief

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that emails to state legislators with only oversight authority over employee’s workplace were protected
• holding that email to ethics commission was protected speech
• stating that an African-American who raised concerns about racial discrimination against himself and other minority employees of the Texas Lottery Commission engaged in protected speech because his complaints were made to Texas legislators rather than his supervisors
• analyzing plaintiff’s particular professional role and duties, even though the ultimate question of whether speech is entitled to protection is considered a legal question
• stating that an African-American who raised concerns about racial discrimination against himself and other minority employees of the Texas Lottery Commission engaged in protected speech because his complaints were made to Texas legislators rather than his supervisors
• “Terminating an employee for engaging in protected speech . . . is an objectively unreasonable violation of such an employee’s First Amendment rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).