Skip to main content

Walker v. Hartman

Citations

  • 516 S.W.3d 71
  • 2017 WL 1173827
  • 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2728

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Hartman’s live pleadings and affidavits, “which we are required to consider as evidence under the TCPA, alleged facts if neither rebutted nor contradicted, demonstrate the elements of causes of action for malicious prosecution and civil conspiracy as to Walker”
  • concluding that Hartman’s live pleadings and affidavits, “which we are required to consider as evidence under the TCPA, alleged facts if neither rebutted nor contradicted, demonstrate the elements of causes of action for malicious prosecution and civil conspiracy as to Walker”
  • noting that under the rules that apply to TCPA dismissal hearings, pleadings are considered “as evidence” under the Act
  • noting that under the rules that apply to TCPA dismissal hearings, pleadings are considered “as evidence” under the Act
  • “Walker’s motion to dismiss under the TCPA survived Hartman’s nonsuiting of certain causes of action.”
  • noting pleadings are considered “as evidence” under the TCPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Horton, Kreger, McKeithen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Walker v. Hartman

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.