Mapes v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them
• providing that to preserve an issue for appeal, even pro se litigants must brief an argument
• finding that a litigant’s claims are “effectively abandoned” when he fails to make the arguments in the body of his appellate brief
• holding “even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them”
• “Although pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them.” (citation omitted)
• “Although pro se briefs are afforded liberal construction, even pro se litigants must brief arguments in order to preserve them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).