Skip to main content

Walker v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 595 S.E.2d 30
  • 42 Va. App. 782
  • 2004 Va. App. LEXIS 169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a seizure had occurred when the officer “explained that he intended to pat down appellant” because, “[a]t this point, a reasonable person would not believe he could ignore the officer's requests and walk away”
  • holding that a seizure had occurred when the officer “explained that he intended to pat down” a suspect because, “at this point, a reasonable person would not believe he could ignore the officer’s requests and walk away”
  • holding appellant’s strange behavior and “very nervous” appearance in area known for drug activity, and officer’s concern when appellant refused to remove hand from his pocket, justified frisk
  • finding appellant’s refusal to remove his hand from his pocket is a factor to be considered in finding reasonable suspicion
  • finding appellant's refusal to remove his hand from his pocket is a factor to be considered in finding reasonable suspicion
  • finding a seizure occurred when an officer “explained that he intended to pat down” a suspect because, “at this point, a reasonable person would not believe he could ignore the officer’s requests and walk away”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annunziata, Frank, McCLANAHAN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.