Brown v. City of Danville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the overwhelming weight of authority does not apply the exclusionary rule to “new and distinct criminal acts in response to unlawful police conduct”
• stating an intervening crime renders “evidence of the events constituting the new criminal activity” admissible (emphasis added)
• “[F]ederal and state courts alike have uniformly rejected the argument that trial courts should suppress evidence relating to [a defendant’s] violence or threatened violence toward police officers subsequent to an unlawful search or seizure or a war-rantless entry.” (quotation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).