Skip to main content

Jones v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 665 S.E.2d 261
  • 52 Va. App. 548
  • 2008 Va. App. LEXIS 410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the existence of “reasonable articulable suspicion [to believe] that [a defendant] possessed a concealed weapon . . . ipso facto rendered him potentially armed and dangerous,” permitting a Terry stop
  • stating that reasonable suspicion that suspect possessed a concealed weapon “ipso facto rendered him potentially armed and dangerous,” justifying a Terry search
  • holding officers may reasonably suspect persons of unlawfully carrying concealed firearms based on particularized belief that such persons are carrying concealed firearms
  • “The law does not expect [that] a police officer must gamble on turning away from a possible danger and chance taking a bullet in the back . . . .” (second alteration in original
  • “[I]t is our responsibility to review de novo questions of law and the ‘trial court’s application of defined legal standards to the particular facts of a case.’” (quoting Watts v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 206, 213 (2002))
  • “[W]e conclude the officers, at the time of [the defendant’s] seizure, had a reasonable articulable suspicion that [the defendant] possessed a concealed weapon and . . . a reasonable suspicion of that offense ipso facto rendered him potentially armed and dangerous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frank, Haley, McCLANAHAN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.