Skip to main content

James v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 473 S.E.2d 90
  • 22 Va. App. 740
  • 1996 Va. App. LEXIS 535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s “jittery” behavior and repeated hand movements after the officer requested that the defendant keep his hands on the dashboard justified a limited pat down
  • “Courts are not remiss in crediting the practical experience of officers who observe on a daily basis what transpires on the street.”
  • officer justified in removing a three to four inch glass smoking device from suspect’s pocket
  • pat down of appellant upheld after he acted “somewhat jittery” and “was unresponsive to [the officer’s] request to keep his hands in [the officer’s] view,” which caused the officer “to be concerned that appellant might be reaching for ‘a weapon or something like that in the car’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Joseph E. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.