Skip to main content
· 4/24/2002

Walk v. Ring

Citations

  • 44 P.3d 990
  • 202 Ariz. 310
  • 378 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 61
  • 2002 Ariz. LEXIS 60

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a reasonable juror could conclude that no immediate duty to investigate a dentist’s negligence arose from severe pain following a dental procedure
  • if fraudulent concealment established, statute of limitations tolled until plaintiff has actual knowledge of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Jones, McGregor, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.