Airfreight Express Ltd. v. Evergreen Air Center, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “affirmative defenses are not claims” for purposes of “[t]he doctrine of claim preclusion”
• holding “a party must timely present his legal theories to the trial court so as to give the trial court an opportunity to rule properly”
• holding evidentiary deficiencies in affidavit supporting motion for summary judgment waived for failure to either object or move to strike
• explaining that an involuntary dismissal order stating that it is without prejudice is not an adjudication on the merits and does not bar a second action under the doctrine of claim preclusion
• “A party must timely present his legal theories to the trial court so as to give the trial court an opportunity to rule properly.”
• we will not consider on appeal issues trial court did not consider or have opportunity to address

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).