Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that informal complaint to supervisor of sexual harassment was protected “complaint” for purposes of section 21.055(3)
• holding there was no evidence to show a causal connection between employee’s report of the sexual rumors and employer’s/supervisor’s decision to terminate him
• holding there was no evidence to show a causal connection between employee’s report of the sexual rumors and employer’s/supervisor’s decision to terminate him
• informal complaint to supervisor of sexual harassment was protected \complaint\ for purposes of section 21.055(3)
• informal complaint to supervisor of sexual harassment was protected “complaint” for purposes of section 21.055(3)
• protection afforded by the statute extends to those who informally voice complaints to their superiors or who use internal grievance procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).