Pension Advisory Group, Ltd. v. COUNTRY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that quantum-meruit and unjust-enrichment claims under Texas law may be stated in the alternative to a breach-of-contract claim
• holding that if Illinois law were applicable to the plaintiff’s causes of action, it would not necessarily warrant transfer to Illinois as the transferor court “is fully equipped to research and interpret the laws of other states”
• holding that if Illinois law were applicable to the plaintiff’s causes of action, it would not necessarily warrant transfer to Illinois as the transferor court “is fully equipped to research and interpret the laws of other states”
• rejecting defendants’ general allegations that certain witnesses are needed and concluding that location of witnesses “does not favor transfer”
• rejecting assertion of inconvenience to witnesses without a sufficient showing of why those witnesses are needed and what testimony they would provide

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).