Skip to main content

Wagner v. Wagner

Citations

  • 887 A.2d 282
  • 2005 Pa. Super. 377
  • 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Pennsylvania was not “the children's ‘home state,’ and the trial court could not exercise jurisdiction over [the] child custody case on this basis”
  • holding parent’s mother needed to seek legal custody of the child from a court to claim a right to legal custody under UCCJEA
  • explaining that a custody order will be deemed final even if the order provides for future hearings upon petition by a party
  • holding that a trial court’s “temporary” custody order allowing for the possibility of a further hearing is a final order: “a custody order that anticipates future hearings that could take place on application of one of the parties is a final, appealable order.”
  • stating the UCCJEA’s predecessor, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, was repealed effective August 16, 2004, when the UCCJEA took effect
  • defining residency as “living in a place, requiring only phys- ical presence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCaffery, Popovich, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.