Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 11/7/2005
Wagner v. Wagner
Citations
- 887 A.2d 282
- 2005 Pa. Super. 377
- 2005 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4001
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Pennsylvania was not “the children's ‘home state,’ and the trial court could not exercise jurisdiction over [the] child custody case on this basis”
- holding parent’s mother needed to seek legal custody of the child from a court to claim a right to legal custody under UCCJEA
- explaining that a custody order will be deemed final even if the order provides for future hearings upon petition by a party
- holding that a trial court’s “temporary” custody order allowing for the possibility of a further hearing is a final order: “a custody order that anticipates future hearings that could take place on application of one of the parties is a final, appealable order.”
- stating the UCCJEA’s predecessor, the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, was repealed effective August 16, 2004, when the UCCJEA took effect
- defining residency as “living in a place, requiring only phys- ical presence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCaffery, Popovich, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jmr v. JmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-07-09· cited 76×
- R.M. v. J.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-06· cited 65×
- B.J.D. v. D.L.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-04-11· cited 34×
- Marriage of Brandt v. BrandtSupreme Court of Colorado· 2012-01-23· cited 34×
- SCHIRADO v. FooteNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-07-13· cited 33×
- Rennie v. ROSENTHOLSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-05-17· cited 31×
- In re F.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-22· cited 24×
- In re MampeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-29· cited 22×
- Billhime v. BillhimeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-03· cited 17×
- Frank R. v. Mother Goose AdoptionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-02-10· cited 15×
- Frempong, S. v. Richardson, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-04-30· cited 15×
- M.E.V. v. R.D.V.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-10-23· cited 15×
- T.D. v. M.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-27· cited 11×
- T.A.M. v. S.L.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-11-07· cited 10×
- C.L. v. Z.M.F.H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-17· cited 8×
- Weliver, J. v. Ortiz, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-03-08· cited 8×
- O.H. Bel Air v. Hinton, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-05-31· cited 5×
- Dept. of Human Services v. J. A. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-10-29· cited 3×
- J.M.R. v. J.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-07-09· cited 1×
- State v. ColbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-07-13
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- G.B. v. M.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-25· cited 137×
- Parker v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-08-09· cited 43×
- Liebner v. SimcoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-10-08· cited 37×
- Lucas v. LucasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-23· cited 35×
- In Re Estate of RoosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-10-01· cited 34×
- Mensch v. MenschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-06-22· cited 17×
- McCoy v. ThreshSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-11-12· cited 16×
- Norman v. Pennsylvania National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-22· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.