Rennie v. ROSENTHOL

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining Court need not consider whether substantial evidence was available in Pennsylvania regarding child’s care, protection, training, and personal relationships, because Court concluded there existed significant connection to Pennsylvania
• trial court correctly rejected mother’s claim that Pennsylvania should have relinquished jurisdiction to the State of Minnesota under the UCCJEA, where child had significant contacts with Pennsylvania
• a state has exclusive, continuing jurisdiction under § 5422(a) of UCCJEA “as long as the child and at least one parent have an important or meaningful relationship” to the state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).