Skip to main content
· 8/9/1985

Parker v. MacDonald

Citations

  • 496 A.2d 1244
  • 344 Pa. Super. 552
  • 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing court did not schedule future review hearing for date certain and inferring that such fact weighed in favor of concluding custody order was final, as compared to situation in which hearing was scheduled
  • attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
  • attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
  • attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
  • a final order has been defined as one which effectively ends litigation or disposes of the entire case
  • attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Cirillo, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.