· 8/9/1985
Parker v. MacDonald
Citations
- 496 A.2d 1244
- 344 Pa. Super. 552
- 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing court did not schedule future review hearing for date certain and inferring that such fact weighed in favor of concluding custody order was final, as compared to situation in which hearing was scheduled
- attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
- attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
- attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
- a final order has been defined as one which effectively ends litigation or disposes of the entire case
- attachment of child to those standing in loco parentis and who have tenderly cared for him can in some instances be controlling in custody decision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, Cirillo, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.