Skip to main content

Wagner v. State

Citations

  • 950 So. 2d 511
  • 2007 WL 704049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s statement that officers “planted” drugs in his house was insufficient “to establish beyond a reasonable doubt his knowledge of the presence of drugs”
  • holding no constructive possession where drugs found in shared apartment concealed under dresser, in men’s pockets of men’s clothing in closet, and in cigar box and no independent evidence showed items belonged to defendant
  • noting the absence of fingerprints failed to connect Wagner to the contraband or the containers in which it was found
  • noting the absence of fingerprints failed to connect Wagner to the contraband or the containers in which it was found
  • “When ... contraband is found in a location that was accessible to more than one person, a defendant’s knowledge of its presence and ability to exercise dominion and control will not be inferred; these elements must be established by independent proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northcutt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.