District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/1/2008
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 995 So. 2d 535
- 2008 WL 2940516
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence of knowledge, dominion, and control was sufficient to deny motion for judgment of acquittal where drugs found during a search were located in or about other personal possessions owned or controlled by the defendant
- holding that evidence of knowledge, dominion, and control was sufficient to deny motion for judgment of acquittal where drugs found during a search were located in or about other personal possessions owned or controlled by the defendant
- \The fact that Jackson was known to habitually carry a purse and the presence of his credit card support the conclusion that the Burberry purse [containing drugs] was Jackson's.\
- “The fact that Jackson was known to habitually carry a purse and the presence of his credit card support the conclusion that the Burberry purse [containing drugs] was Jackson’s.”
- “An inference of knowledge and dominion and control may also arise where the contraband located in jointly occupied premises is found in or about other personal property which is shown to be owned or controlled by the defendant.”
- credit card bearing defendant’s name
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Canady
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-01-18· cited 25×
- Bennett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-05· cited 13×
- Nicholas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-28· cited 12×
- Pinkney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-18· cited 11×
- Evans v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-20· cited 9×
- Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-14· cited 5×
- Rangel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-08· cited 3×
- Edwards v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-12· cited 2×
- Blanchard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-01· cited 1×
- DEMETRIUS NUGENT v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-07· cited 1×
- Jenrette-Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-31
- Tolbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-06-18
- Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-31
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Pagan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
- State v. LawSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
- Lynch v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
- Chicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-24· cited 155×
- Frank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-05-23· cited 141×
- Gee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 89×
- Wale v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-04-29· cited 65×
- Amato v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-06-18· cited 40×
- United States v. Domenick CasalinuovoSecond Circuit· 1965-08-02· cited 32×
- Wagner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-09· cited 26×
- Cochran v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 20×
- Tsavaris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-07· cited 14×
- Doby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-11-30· cited 12×
- State v. FossettSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1979-03-23· cited 12×
- Pena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-29· cited 10×
- Cook v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-11· cited 9×
- Loyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-19· cited 8×
- State v. HollandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-05· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.