Jiles v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he location of contraband in plain view of the defendant is sufficient to establish the knowledge element of constructive possession.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ubiles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-06· cited 18×
• Jennings v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-11· cited 14×
• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-02-08· cited 6×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-16· cited 6×
• State v. Robinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-29· cited 1×
• Sheppard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-24· cited 1×
• DEMETRIUS NUGENT v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-07· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pagan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-04· cited 599×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-03· cited 180×
• Plichta v. Plichta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-29· cited 40×
• Wagner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-09· cited 26×
• Martoral v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-01-17· cited 24×
• Hargrove v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-24· cited 20×
• E.A.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-11· cited 18×
• Cruz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-10· cited 17×
• Pena v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-03-29· cited 10×
• J.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-05· cited 5×