Wagner v. Gallup, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in considering whether a video exhibit is taxable under section 1920(4), “the standard the court will apply to direct its discretion is whether the video materially aided [the judge’s] understanding of the technological issues in the case”
• noting that the deadline is “not mandatory”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).