Skip to main content
· 3/5/2012

Gibson v. American Greetings Corp.

Citations

  • 670 F.3d 844
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4475
  • 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,449
  • 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 927
  • 2012 WL 686198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party
  • assuming that plaintiffs established a prima facie case of race discrimination and affirming grant of summary judgment because there was insufficient evidence that employer's actions were pretext for discrimination
  • emphasizing that the termination occurred “only after” the employee had accumulated prior “written warnings”
  • noting that there are at least two routes for demonstrating a material question of fact as to pretext: showing the proffered explanation has no basis in fact or that a prohibited reason more likely motivated the defendant
  • assuming the plaintiff stated a prima facie case and disposing of the matter on pretext grounds
  • assuming the plaintiff stated a prima facie case and disposing of the matter on pretext grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Bye, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.