· 3/5/2012
Gibson v. American Greetings Corp.
Citations
- 670 F.3d 844
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 4475
- 95 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,449
- 114 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 927
- 2012 WL 686198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that we review a grant of summary judgment de novo, viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party
- assuming that plaintiffs established a prima facie case of race discrimination and affirming grant of summary judgment because there was insufficient evidence that employer's actions were pretext for discrimination
- emphasizing that the termination occurred “only after” the employee had accumulated prior “written warnings”
- noting that there are at least two routes for demonstrating a material question of fact as to pretext: showing the proffered explanation has no basis in fact or that a prohibited reason more likely motivated the defendant
- assuming the plaintiff stated a prima facie case and disposing of the matter on pretext grounds
- assuming the plaintiff stated a prima facie case and disposing of the matter on pretext grounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Bye, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.