· 7/15/2010
Tana v. Dantanna's
Citations
- 611 F.3d 767
- 96 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14514
- 2010 WL 2773447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the same test applies for infringement in both the trademark and service mark contexts
- “Although likelihood of confusion is a question of fact, it may be decided as a matter of law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmondson, Carnes, Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.