Skip to main content
· 7/15/2010

Tana v. Dantanna's

Citations

  • 611 F.3d 767
  • 96 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 14514
  • 2010 WL 2773447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the same test applies for infringement in both the trademark and service mark contexts
  • “Although likelihood of confusion is a question of fact, it may be decided as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Carnes, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.