Texas Supreme Court· 10/2/1997
Wadewitz v. Montgomery
Citations
- 951 S.W.2d 464
- 1997 WL 378072
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding conclusory statements by an expert are not sufficient to support or defeat summary judgment
- refusing to find good faith because officer did not discuss all of the Chambers factors
- discussing the factors involved in balancing the need/risk elements of good faith for purposes of determining official immunity
- elaborating on the good-faith test's need and risk elements and identifying several factors implicated by those inquiries
- addressing the requirements of expert affidavits with respect to the same rules that are applied to affidavits from interested witnesses
- finding government employee has immunity from actions performed within his discretionary duties if employee acts in good faith
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spector, Enoch, Phillips, Gonzalez, Cornyn, Baker, Abbott, Hecht, Owen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
302 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-05-14· cited 650×
- Hamilton v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court· 2008-03-28· cited 543×
- City of San Antonio v. PollockTexas Supreme Court· 2009-05-01· cited 436×
- Blan v. AliTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1999-11-18· cited 269×
- University of Houston v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 259×
- Telthorster v. TennellTexas Supreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 238×
- Ballantyne v. Champion Builders, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 210×
- Reynaldo Ramirez v. Jim Wells County, TexasFifth Circuit· 2013-05-15· cited 195×
- CA PARTNERS v. SpearsTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-12-18· cited 166×
- 1001 McKinney Ltd. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage CapitalTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-03-16· cited 126×
- City of San Angelo Fire Department v. HudsonTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-11-03· cited 86×
- General Motors Corp. v. IrachetaTexas Supreme Court· 2005-04-08· cited 78×
- Swank v. CunninghamTex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2008-05-22· cited 68×
- Green v. AlfordTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-11-20· cited 51×
- Aguirre v. VasquezTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-05-01· cited 49×
- Bridges v. RobinsonTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-06-15· cited 47×
- Vela v. RochaTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2001-07-12· cited 47×
- Barry Brooks, Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, Johanna Barton, and Jesse Rodriguez Benavides v. Excellence Mortgage, Ltd. LADTD-1, LLC Grothues Financial, Ltd. Grothues Brothers Management I, LLC And Georgetown Mortgage, L.L.C.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-12-09· cited 47×
- Ramos v. Texas Department of Public SafetyTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2000-11-30· cited 46×
- Plunkett v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-06-30· cited 46×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court· 1994-06-15· cited 928×
- Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 801×
- DeWitt v. Harris CountyTexas Supreme Court· 1995-09-14· cited 391×
- Anderson v. SniderTexas Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 312×
- Mercer v. Daoran Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 183×
- City of Beverly Hills v. GuevaraTexas Supreme Court· 1995-09-14· cited 57×
- Mitchell v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-03-25· cited 20×
- Wadewitz v. MontgomeryTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-02-14· cited 5×
Other cases named Wadewitz v. Montgomery
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.