Skip to main content

Wadewitz v. Montgomery

Citations

  • 951 S.W.2d 464
  • 1997 WL 378072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding conclusory statements by an expert are not sufficient to support or defeat summary judgment
  • refusing to find good faith because officer did not discuss all of the Chambers factors
  • discussing the factors involved in balancing the need/risk elements of good faith for purposes of determining official immunity
  • elaborating on the good-faith test's need and risk elements and identifying several factors implicated by those inquiries
  • addressing the requirements of expert affidavits with respect to the same rules that are applied to affidavits from interested witnesses
  • finding government employee has immunity from actions performed within his discretionary duties if employee acts in good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spector, Enoch, Phillips, Gonzalez, Cornyn, Baker, Abbott, Hecht, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

302 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Wadewitz v. Montgomery

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.