Mercer v. Daoran Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a legal conclusion is insufficient to raise an issue of fact in response to a motion for summary judgment
• holding that a legal conclusion is insufficient to raise an issue of fact in response to a motion for summary judgment
• holding that a legal conclusion is insufficient to raise an issue of fact in response to a motion for summary judgment
• holding that a legal conclusion is insufficient to raise an issue of fact in response to a motion for summary judgment
• holding that affiant bank president’s statement that “entire principal indebtedness . . . was renewed and extended” constituted legal opinion insufficient to create fact issue in response to summary-judgment motion
• holding that unexecuted “sworn copy” of note that was allegedly prepared for debtors to sign, without explaining failure to produce the original or a copy of the executed note, was inadmissible summary judgment evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).