Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 2/17/2010

V.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. Muhammad

Citations

  • 595 F.3d 426
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 3017
  • 2010 WL 536719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was plausible that a 22 month old was “conscious of her prolonged separation from her parents” and her confinement where the complaint alleged she “suffered extreme humiliation, pain and suffering, terror, mental anguish and depression’
  • concluding that even if the caseworker had been aware that the presiding doctor had a “reputation” for over-diagnosing child abuse, it was not unreasonable for them to rely on the doctor’s diagnosis when her opinion was shared by other doctors
  • holding qualified immunity applied to caseworkers because it was objectively reasonable for them to rely on the—ultimately incorrect—diagnosis of a qualified medical professional
  • observing that federal courts are “bound to apply the law as interpreted by a state’s intermediate appellate courts unless there is persuasive evidence that the state’s highest court would reach a different conclusion”
  • finding qualified immunity for all city defendants despite that a relevant exculpatory fact regarding custody at the time of injury was not raised to the Family Court
  • this Court is “bound to apply the law as interpreted by …. the state's highest court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner, Cabranes, Rakoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named V.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. Muhammad

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.