Second Circuit· 3/31/2020
Chen v. Dunkin' Brands, Inc.
Citations
- 954 F.3d 492
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a reasonable consumer purchasing an Angus Steak & Egg Breakfast Sandwich for $4 from Dunkin’ Donuts would not be misled into thinking she was purchasing an intact steak
- holding that Bristol-Myers applies to named plaintiffs in the class action context
- ruling that a reasonable consumer purchasing a grab-and-go “Angus Steak & Egg Breakfast Sandwich” (~$4) or an “Angus Steak & Egg Wake-Up Wrap” (~$2) from Dunkin Donuts would not be misled into thinking she was purchasing an actual, intact “steak”
- noting that it is only in a “truly exceptional case” that a corporate defendant will be treated as “at home” in forums other than “where it is incorporated or maintains its principal place of business”
- owning multiple franchises in New York does not subject a company to its general jurisdiction
- finding no general jurisdiction even though defendant had numerous establishments in New York because plaintiffs did not allege facts showing that the defendant’s contacts in New York were significant in relation to its nationwide business activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Daou v. BLC Bank, S.A.L.Second Circuit· 2022-07-28· cited 39×
- Tarpon Bay Partners LLC v. Zerez Holdings CorporationSecond Circuit· 2023-08-11· cited 14×
- Reyes v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2025-06-18· cited 6×
- Sutton v. TapscottSecond Circuit· 2024-11-04· cited 4×
- People v. TrumpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2023-06-27· cited 1×
- Anna Aybar v. Jose A. Aybar, JrNew York Court of Appeals· 2021-10-07
- Servpro Industries, LLC v. Reed Gaskin and Brittany GaskinTex. App. Ct., 15th Dist.· 2025-11-17
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court· 2014-01-14· cited 4,713×
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals· 2002-07-02· cited 1,819×
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals· 1995-02-14· cited 1,009×
- Fink v. Time Warner CableSecond Circuit· 2013-05-06· cited 431×
- Brown ex rel. Estate of Brown v. Lockheed Martin Corp. ex rel. Martin-Marietta Corp.Second Circuit· 2016-02-18· cited 333×
- SPV Osus Ltd. v. UBS AGSecond Circuit· 2018-02-09· cited 285×
- In Re Nortel Networks Corp. Securities LitigationSecond Circuit· 2008-08-19· cited 282×
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Bank of ChinaSecond Circuit· 2014-09-17· cited 259×
- The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesSecond Circuit· 1994-01-04· cited 216×
- Lou Dibella and Dibella Entertainment, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Bernard Hopkins, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantSecond Circuit· 2005-04-04· cited 211×
- Cynthia Maurizio v. Olivia Goldsmith, AKA Justine Rendal, AKA Randi J. GoldfieldSecond Circuit· 2000-11-01· cited 202×
- Geron ex rel. Estate of Thelen LLP v. Seyfarth Shaw LLP (In re Thelen LLP)Second Circuit· 2013-11-15· cited 161×
- Building Industry Electrical Contractors Ass'n v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2012-05-04· cited 94×
- V.S. Ex Rel. T.S. v. MuhammadSecond Circuit· 2010-02-17· cited 85×
- Geffner v. The Coca-Cola CompanySecond Circuit· 2019-06-27· cited 45×
- Broder v. MBNA Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2001-03-29· cited 28×
- Ludl Electronics Products, Ltd. v. Wells Fargo Financial Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-04-05· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.