Skip to main content
· 7/2/2008

Appel v. Spiridon

Citations

  • 531 F.3d 138
  • 27 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1526
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13848
  • 91 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,263
  • 104 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 562
  • 2008 WL 2597940

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, in light of Engquist, “the Equal Protection Clause does not apply to a public employee asserting a violation ... based on a ‘class of one’ theory of liability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Straub, Cedarbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.