Skip to main content
· 10/23/1975

Vernon v. Drexel Burnham & Co.

Citations

  • 52 Cal. App. 3d 706
  • 125 Cal. Rptr. 147
  • 1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 1501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under California law, upholding an implied prohibition on the \consolidation of claims\ in arbitration provision
  • under California law, upholding an implied prohibition on the \consolidation of claims\ in arbitration provision
  • failure to read the terms of a 11 contract is not a meritorious defense to enforcement of an 12 unread term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.