Comb v. PayPal, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Limiting venue to PayPal’s backyard appears to be yet one more means by which the arbitration clause serves to shield PayPal from liability instead of providing a neutral forum in which to arbitrate disputes.”
• \Limiting venue to PayPal's backyard appears to be yet one more means by which the arbitration clause serves to shield Pay-Pal from liability instead of providing a neutral forum in which to arbitrate disputes.\
• “Terminating an employee for improper or discriminatory reasons, like many other adverse personnel management decisions, is insufficiently extreme or outrageous to give rise to a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress.”
• “Limiting venue to PayPal’s backyard appears to be yet one more means by which the arbitration clause serves to shield PayPal from liability instead of providing a neutral forum in which to arbitrate disputes.”
• “Limiting venue to PayPal’s backyard appears to be yet one more means by which the arbitration clause serves to shield PayPal from liability instead of provid- ing a neutral forum in which to arbitrate disputes.”
• express prohibition on \consolidation of claims\ in arbitration agreement unconscionable under California law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).