California Court of Appeal· 3/15/1972
Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Citations
- 24 Cal. App. 3d 35
- 100 Cal. Rptr. 791
- 1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 1114
- 1972 Trade Cas. (CCH) 74,136
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- invalidating under Section 16600 profit-sharing plan term that caused former employee to forgo benefits if employee competed with former employer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-08-25· cited 473×
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court· 1973-12-04· cited 282×
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-08-10· cited 275×
- Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-05-16· cited 104×
- Don Ray Smith v. Cmta-Iam Pension TrustNinth Circuit· 1981-08-27· cited 72×
- Harris v. TAP Worldwide, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-06-22· cited 66×
- City of Claremont v. KruseCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-08-27· cited 53×
- Sparks v. Vista Del Mar Child & Family ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-07-30· cited 48×
- King v. Larsen Realty, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1981-06-24· cited 43×
- Neisendorf v. Levi Strauss & Co.California Court of Appeal· 2006-08-29· cited 39×
- Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. G & G Fire Sprinklers, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2002-10-01· cited 37×
- Ives v. Manchester Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-07-26· cited 35×
- Vernon v. Drexel Burnham & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1975-10-23· cited 33×
- Robert Muh v. Newburger, Loeb & Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Does I Through XxNinth Circuit· 1976-07-08· cited 31×
- International Business MacHines Corporation v. Dr. Christopher H. Bajorek, Chris Bajorek v. International Business MacHines CorporationNinth Circuit· 1999-09-14· cited 28×
- In Re Work Uniform CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-10-11· cited 27×
- Triad Data Services, Inc. v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1984-01-30· cited 25×
- Dep't of Indus. Relations v. UI Video Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1997-05-16· cited 24×
- Suess v. Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 1988-09-16· cited 22×
- Hope v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-07-29· cited 22×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Muggill v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.California Supreme Court· 1965-01-19· cited 105×
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-09-28· cited 86×
- Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1971-10-19· cited 60×
- Allstate Insurance v. OrlandoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-06-11· cited 29×
- Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1965-10-20· cited 22×
- Federico v. FrickCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-01-26· cited 20×
- Larrus v. First National Bank of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-01-28· cited 19×
- Gear v. WebsterCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-01-18· cited 18×
- Loscalzo v. Federal Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-07-09· cited 18×
- Bianco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-08-22· cited 17×
- Oakland Bank of Commerce v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-04-21· cited 16×
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court· 1970-01-20· cited 14×
- Estate of HollingsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1940-02-23· cited 11×
- People v. AlvesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-11-26· cited 9×
- Durkee v. WelchS.D. California· 1931-03-25· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.