Skip to main content
· 3/30/1992

Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.

Citations

  • 826 P.2d 710
  • 2 Cal. 4th 342
  • 6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 467
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2777
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 4311
  • 1992 Cal. LEXIS 1088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “as a general matter, implied terms should never be read to vary express 16 terms”
  • stating that plaintiff must plead that the 19 defendant unfairly interfered with the plaintiff’s right to receive the benefits of the contract as 20 expressed
  • stating that plaintiff must plead that the 19 defendant unfairly interfered with the plaintiff’s right to receive the benefits of the contract as 20 expressed
  • explaining that 17 parties with discretionary power must exercise it “for any purpose within the reasonable 18 contemplation of the parties at the time of formation”
  • noting that “implied terms should never be read to vary express terms”
  • deferring to a commercial landlord's contractually authorized, good faith, exercise of discretion to terminate a lease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Puglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.