Skip to main content

Venturino v. State

Citations

  • 830 S.E.2d 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was no error in refusing to charge the jury on mutual combat where the defendant’s “own testimony ― in which he claimed self-defense ― contradicted a theory of mutual combat”
  • explaining that “attorneys are not permitted to misstate the law to the jury”
  • no error in refusing to charge on mutual combat where defendant’s “own testimony — in which he claimed self-defense — contradicted 15 a theory of mutual combat”
  • Appellant “points to no record evidence that he and [the victim] intended to engage in mutual combat, and we can find none.”
  • no error in refusing to charge the jury on mutual combat where defendant’s own testimony — in which he claimed self-defense — contradicted theory of mutual combat and there was no other evidence to support such a theory
  • prosecutor’s misstatement of law during closing argument was harmless error in light of court’s instruction to jury upon defense’s objection that the court would be charging on what the law is and the court’s later correct jury charge on the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.