Venalonzo v. People

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony about what the 27 defendant said in audio recording was improper because “the jury was in precisely the same position as the detective to hear and interpret the words spoken by [the defendant] on the recording”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).