Howard-Walker v. People
Citations
- 2019 CO 69
- 443 P.3d 1007
Syllabus
In this case, the Supreme Court concluded that a division of the Court of Appeals erred by supplementing this Court's cumulative error standard with case law from federal courts. The Court reaffirmed that the proper standard for analyzing cumulative error claims stems from Oaks v. People, 371 P.2d 443 (Colo. 1962). Applying that standard, the Court concluded that the cumulative prejudicial effect of various trial errors deprived defendant of a fair trial. Accordingly, the Court reversed the judgment of conviction and remanded for a new trial.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- cumulative error analysis is required only when multiple errors have been identified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- v. VidauriColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-09-05· cited 578×
- v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-06-08· cited 495×
- v. DaleyColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-06-25· cited 396×
- v. SauserColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-01-05· cited 272×
- Peo v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-10-08· cited 269×
- v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-06-15· cited 247×
- v. BobianColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-12-19· cited 216×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Randy D. TALLENTSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-09-27· cited 93×
- v. ThamesColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-08-08· cited 38×
- People v. SchlehuberColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-05-15· cited 36×
- People v. MelaraColorado Court of Appeals· 2025-05-15· cited 32×
- The People of the State of Colorado v. Robert Keith Ray.Supreme Court of Colorado· 2025-06-23· cited 21×
- v. HernandezColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-07-25· cited 19×
- People v. PerezColorado Court of Appeals· 2024-08-22· cited 16×
- v. VialpandoColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-03-19· cited 12×
- People v. Clinton CooperColorado Court of Appeals· 2023-11-30· cited 3×
- 20SC343- People v. VialpandoSupreme Court of Colorado· 2022-06-21· cited 2×
- People v. Toni Theresa TorrezColorado Court of Appeals· 2024-02-08· cited 1×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Levi Derek HALLSupreme Court of Colorado· 2021-10-18· cited 1×
- People v. FeldmanColorado Court of Appeals· 2024-11-07· cited 1×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court· 2006-06-26· cited 1,863×
- People v. LuceroSupreme Court of Colorado· 1980-08-11· cited 1,007×
- Ronquillo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-10-16· cited 859×
- Venalonzo v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-02-06· cited 792×
- Weaver v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 717×
- Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 552×
- United States v. Marvin BakerEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-13· cited 540×
- James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2018-09-17· cited 520×
- Griego v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-02-20· cited 460×
- People v. WittreinSupreme Court of Colorado· 2009-12-14· cited 288×
- People v. NovotnySupreme Court of Colorado· 2014-03-17· cited 288×
- Davis v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2013-09-09· cited 198×
- People v. MozeeSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-06-23· cited 126×
- United States v. CarawayTenth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 99×
- Liggett v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-05-15· cited 83×
- Morrison v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-06-26· cited 82×
- Oaks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1962-05-28· cited 77×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.